From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfhPV-0004yC-R6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:03:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfhPT-0004vw-Pp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:03:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfhPT-0004vm-LJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:03:11 -0400 Received: from [213.247.139.22] (helo=mail.sub.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FfhRv-0006SP-Ui for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:05:44 -0400 Received: from unknown ([213.247.139.22]) by localhost (webmail.sub.ru [213.247.139.22]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 17443-15 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 22:03:02 +0400 (MSD) From: Mikhail Ramendik Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:03:00 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605152203.00826.mr@ramendik.ru> Subject: [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hello, As I have reported before, it seems that on my host linux system kqemu does not work with guest win98se. Is there any benchmark that I could run in the guest, with and without kqemu, to check if this is so objectively? (Ideally I'd like two benchmarks - 16-bit and 32-bit code). -- Yours, Mikhail Ramendik