From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: audit 1.2.2 released
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:23:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200605161323.32162.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4469F585.6030108@hp.com>
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 11:53, Linda Knippers wrote:
> His transcript was when running in permissive mode so won't you only get
> the avc deny once?
If its in permissive, you shouldn't get any failure that results in EPERM from
SE Linux. But on second look, this AVC has a success=yes, so maybe not the
smoking gun. If there was a corresponding AVC with success=no, then that
would be notable.
AFAICT, there are 2 places where an access decision is made, audit_netlink_ok
in kernel/audit.c. And the other place is selinux_nlmsg_lookup in
security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c. I think you'd want to patch your kernel to
printk its access decision results in both of those functions. That should
tell us something about what's going on.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-16 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-12 21:26 audit 1.2.2 released Steve Grubb
2006-05-15 19:57 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-15 20:04 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-15 20:14 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-16 14:53 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-16 15:23 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-16 16:08 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-16 16:28 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-16 15:34 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-16 15:53 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-16 17:23 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2006-05-16 20:38 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-16 21:49 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-16 22:31 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-05-17 10:25 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-22 17:31 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-22 19:15 ` Xin Zhao
2006-05-22 19:24 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-22 19:37 ` Xin Zhao
2006-05-22 19:47 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-22 20:15 ` Xin Zhao
2006-05-23 6:56 ` Amy Griffis
2006-05-23 3:43 ` Xin Zhao
2006-05-23 15:11 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-23 16:24 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-23 22:20 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-23 23:05 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-24 19:44 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-24 20:58 ` James Antill
2006-05-25 13:48 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-25 15:16 ` James Antill
2006-05-25 15:22 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-25 15:40 ` James Antill
2006-05-24 13:04 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-24 20:30 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 15:32 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 15:45 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 21:12 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 21:23 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-17 21:43 ` Michael C Thompson
2006-05-17 21:55 ` Steve Grubb
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-25 15:50 Chad Hanson
2006-05-26 16:05 ` Darrel Goeddel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200605161323.32162.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linda.knippers@hp.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.