From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/6][RESEND] xen: Add NUMA support to Xen
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:57:08 +0200
Message-ID: <200605161457.09187.ak@suse.de>
References: <20060501215648.GU16776@us.ibm.com> <200605152246.30374.ak@suse.de>
	<25076f74e546e868c489e384ee838e2e@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <25076f74e546e868c489e384ee838e2e@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Ryan Grimm <grimm@us.ibm.com>, Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


> Yes, my gut feeling looking at x86_64's numa.c is that it's going to 
> need some heavier surgery than srat.c. I wouldn't worry so much about 
> keeping that one close to the Linux original: if we end up pulling down 
> more Linux memory bookkeeping code later then we can always go back and 
> sync the file more closely. Keep it as clean as possible though, 
> obviously (e.g., replacing whole functions is nicer than functions that 
> are a hacky halfway house between Linux and Xen, etc).

If it helps I can split these functions into smaller ones in the mainline
sources. That could isolate the pglists in only very small functions.

-Andi