From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: different AX25.H files with same names Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:49:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20060518144954.GA1063@linux-mips.org> References: <20060506223800.GA4419@linux-mips.org> <4465D18F.5070405@ccr.jussieu.fr> <20060513144258.GA3640@linux-mips.org> <44670260.2050105@ccr.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44670260.2050105@ccr.jussieu.fr> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bernard Pidoux Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 12:11:44PM +0200, Bernard Pidoux wrote: > Ralf Baechle DL5RB wrote : > >On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 02:31:11PM +0200, Bernard Pidoux wrote: > > > >>By the way, its a long time since I want to ask if there is any reason > >>to keep the same name for different ax25.h include files. > >> > >>/usr/include/netax25/ax25.h > >>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/ax25.h > >>/usr/src/linux/include/net/ax25.h > >> > >>Somehow it may be confusing. > > > >One for building applications, one for the kernel itself. > > > >73 de DL5RB op Ralf > > > >-- > >Loc. JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21 > > I understand that these files have different usage. > This is why I think that they should have different names. > So why not rename it ax25_kernel.h I just don't see a convcingint reason for it. If it aint broke don't fix it. Chances are renaming will break some software which against good advice is using the kernel header file anyway. Ralf