From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tab@snarc.org (Vincent Hanquez) Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4? Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:58:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20060519135853.GA10674@snarc.org> References: <005201c67b4a$9b99ebb0$9929e29f@IBMSYZH> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005201c67b4a$9b99ebb0$9929e29f@IBMSYZH> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Yuzhong Sun Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:46:19PM +0800, Yuzhong Sun wrote: > I am porting OpenMosix on top of Xen. However, the stable release of > openMosix is based on Linux Kernel 2.4(They are trying to port it to kernel > 2.6). There's lots more work to port 2.4 kernels to Xen-3, than to finish 2.6 openmosix. Now you could just use Xen-2, which support 2.4 kernels. Patching 2.4 kernel on Xen2 with openmosix should be trivial. > I wonder why Xen didn't support the lower kernel version such as 2.4 kernel. > There is some open sources based on kernel 2.4. I wouldn't count openmosix-2.4 as a good source here ... -- Vincent Hanquez