From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann Dirson Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Add a test to check git-prune does not throw away revs hidden by a graft. Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:55:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20060519185558.GE6535@nowhere.earth> References: <20060518213519.14577.67309.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> <7viro3nh07.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060518222045.GB6535@nowhere.earth> <20060518225216.GC6535@nowhere.earth> <7vsln7lzbj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 19 20:44:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fh9xQ-00081I-WA for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 20:44:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964793AbWESSoN (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2006 14:44:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964792AbWESSoN (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2006 14:44:13 -0400 Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.30]:49808 "EHLO smtp4-g19.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964793AbWESSoN (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2006 14:44:13 -0400 Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.214.146]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FD354974; Fri, 19 May 2006 20:44:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FhA8m-0003p3-48; Fri, 19 May 2006 20:56:00 +0200 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vsln7lzbj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 03:53:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Yann Dirson writes: > > > To make my point maybe more clear: if someone really wants to make a > > graft permanent, wouldn't some history rewriting ... be the > > way to go,... > > Yes. So if temporary usage is a typical use for grafts, don't we want to protect people using them from pruning ? I got no feedback to my suggestion of changing the default behaviour, even to say it was a bad idea :) Best regards, -- Yann Dirson | Debian-related: | Support Debian GNU/Linux: | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check