From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle DL5RB Subject: Re: AX.25, NETROM and ROSE changes in 2.6.17 Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 01:06:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20060522000629.GA20046@linux-mips.org> References: <20060506223800.GA4419@linux-mips.org> <4470E0EA.70104@ccr.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4470E0EA.70104@ccr.jussieu.fr> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bernard Pidoux Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:51:38PM +0200, Bernard Pidoux wrote: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 mai 21 23:25 dama_slave_timeout > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 mai 21 23:25 protocol > > It appears that dama_slave_timeout and protocol parameters are not in > the AX25 table. They are only there if CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE has been selected. > ll /proc/sys/net/netrom/ > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 mai 21 23:36 reset > > reset parameter is not listed. Not ajustable ? It's a relativly new thing, the G8ZPT-style NET/ROM circuit resets. It's of course ajustable, the file has "rw" set. > ll /proc/sys/net/rose/ > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 mai 21 23:33 no_activity_timeout > > Again, parameter no_activity_timeout is not in the ROSE table. I suppose this was just inherited from the old, less than perfect documentation. 73 de DL5RB op Ralf -- Loc. JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21