From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, dragoran <dragoran@feuerpokemon.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de
Subject: [2.6 patch] x86_64: don't printk for unimplemented 32bit syscalls
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 02:17:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060522001721.GF3339@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060521194704.GJ8250@redhat.com>
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:47:04PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 09:38:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 02:56:10PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually it is kinda throttled, but only on process name.
> > > This patch just removes that stuff completely.
> > > (Also removes a bunch of trailing whitespace)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > --- linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c~ 2006-05-21 14:50:57.000000000 -0400
> > > +++ linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2006-05-21 14:51:48.000000000 -0400
> > > @@ -522,17 +522,9 @@ sys32_waitpid(compat_pid_t pid, unsigned
> > > }
> > >
> > > int sys32_ni_syscall(int call)
> > > -{
> > > - struct task_struct *me = current;
> > > - static char lastcomm[sizeof(me->comm)];
> > > -
> > > - if (strncmp(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm))) {
> > > - printk(KERN_INFO "IA32 syscall %d from %s not implemented\n",
> > > - call, me->comm);
> > > - strncpy(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm));
> > > - }
> > > - return -ENOSYS;
> > > -}
> > > +{
> > > + return -ENOSYS;
> > > +}
> > >...
> >
> > Why can't we remove sys32_ni_syscall() and call sys_ni_syscall()
> > instead if all we want to do is to return -ENOSYS?
>
> We could, though it's a more invasive patch, which would probably sprinkle
> extra includes/externs over multiple files, for no practical gain
> over having this tiny function isolated to this file.
Where exactly is the problem with the patch below (only compile tested
due to lack of hardware)?
> Dave
cu
Adrian
<-- snip -->
Don't let users spam the logs by using unimplemented 32bit syscalls.
Simply use sys_ni_syscall().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
---
arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S | 2 +-
arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c | 13 -------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- linux-git-x86_64/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c.old 2006-05-22 02:10:15.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-git-x86_64/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2006-05-22 02:10:24.000000000 +0200
@@ -508,19 +508,6 @@
return compat_sys_wait4(pid, stat_addr, options, NULL);
}
-int sys32_ni_syscall(int call)
-{
- struct task_struct *me = current;
- static char lastcomm[sizeof(me->comm)];
-
- if (strncmp(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm))) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "IA32 syscall %d from %s not implemented\n",
- call, me->comm);
- strncpy(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm));
- }
- return -ENOSYS;
-}
-
/* 32-bit timeval and related flotsam. */
asmlinkage long
--- linux-git-x86_64/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S.old 2006-05-22 02:10:56.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-git-x86_64/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S 2006-05-22 02:11:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@
ni_syscall:
movq %rax,%rdi
- jmp sys32_ni_syscall
+ jmp sys_ni_syscall
quiet_ni_syscall:
movq $-ENOSYS,%rax
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-22 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-21 8:35 IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64 dragoran
2006-05-21 8:50 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 9:06 ` dragoran
2006-05-21 9:11 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 9:26 ` dragoran
2006-05-21 9:54 ` dragoran
2006-05-21 16:03 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 18:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-05-21 18:50 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 18:56 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 19:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-21 19:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-22 0:17 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-05-21 22:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-21 22:28 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 22:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-21 23:48 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 23:51 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-22 5:59 ` dragoran
2006-05-22 12:41 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-23 14:30 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-05-21 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-21 19:35 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 19:38 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060522001721.GF3339@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dragoran@feuerpokemon.de \
--cc=drepper@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.