From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FiGV6-0001VX-TN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 15:55:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FiGV6-0001VI-0Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 15:55:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiGV5-0001VF-Sb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 15:55:35 -0400 Received: from [66.54.152.27] (helo=jive.SoftHome.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FiGZ9-0002B7-4e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 15:59:47 -0400 From: Mulyadi Santosa Subject: Re: RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] single step with no IRQs and timers Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 02:42:58 +0700 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605230242.58320.a_mulyadi@softhome.net> Reply-To: a_mulyadi@softhome.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Wessel, Jason" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Jason.. > The patch is completely arch independent and should work with any of > the targets that use the gdb-stub. Just want to report that I gave it a try and it works great. However, I am just courious, what happen if I use stepbit=0x6? That means: IRQ off, timer off, but single step disabled, right? Does that mean I am no longer able to single step? I tested that mask and single step still work as expected. maybe it is better to just ignore this specific bit (single step enabled)? regards, Mulyadi.