All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Graham Wood <gwood@dragonhold.org>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] rescue data after hd crash
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:45:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060531124546.GF13142@dragonhold.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <optae062jz51dxvh@notebook_chl.intern>

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:34:04PM +0200, chris wrote:
> I have create a volume group with 4 250GByte harddisks with an ext3 file  
> system on the 1TB result.
Stripe or concat?

> now the third harddisk failed and the volume group is "dead" - obviously.
The way you created the volume had no redundancy - therefore 25% of your data is gone, as 
well as the volume's "completeness".

If you did a concat, then you (with playing) may be able to get some data back from the 
first 500GB of the volume - but I wouldn't want to rely on anything that came back from it.  
I'd suggest getting hold of 2 identical blank disks, and doing a binary (dd) copy of disks 1 
and 2 to them - and then work on them.  You might be able to use vgcfg{backup,restore} to 
tell the system that this volume is actually only on 2 disks....  However, anything that 
references data > 500GB into the volume is almost definitely lost - because although you've 
got 750G-1TB, it's almost all going to be linked back into the section that you've lost.

If you did a stripe, then you can forget getting any data back off it.  You've lost every 
4th block of whatever size you striped on.  E.g. with a 64k stripe size, you'll have lost 
from 128k-192k, 384k-448k, etc. - and there's almost definitely going to be nothing 
salvagable from that.

Graham

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-31 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-31 12:34 [linux-lvm] rescue data after hd crash chris
2006-05-31 12:45 ` Graham Wood [this message]
2006-05-31 21:31   ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-05-31 22:39     ` chris
2006-05-31 23:25       ` Heinz Mauelshagen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-30 23:02 chris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060531124546.GF13142@dragonhold.org \
    --to=gwood@dragonhold.org \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.