From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle DL5RB Subject: Re: callsign limit Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:52:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20060601185228.GC10812@linux-mips.org> References: <200605310927.56706.vk3heg@iinet.net.au> <20060531093716.GA21395@cloud.net.au> <620c90570605310403o1e4b94bcgf4ab922ef26983e4@mail.gmail.com> <20060531111919.GA22980@cloud.net.au> <20060601014047.GB27504@linux-mips.org> <447ED7B2.3070701@sktc.net> <20060601150854.GA19527@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Curt, WE7U" Cc: "David D. Hagood" , linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 08:15:35AM -0700, Curt, WE7U wrote: > > > Are we still talking about AX.25 here? This is from the AX.25 > > > version 2.0 spec, published in 1984: > > > > May it rest in peace. V2.2 dated 1997 is the latest. > > Last I heard 2.2 is not used anywhere. > > As far as I know around here, everyone still codes to the 1984 spec. Yes and no. I don't think anything tries to follow the new spec to the letter but quite a few of it's elements have made it into actual implementations. 73 de DL5RB op Ralf -- Loc. JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21