From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
draghuram@rocketmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:10:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060602091015.C18533@openss7.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060602074845.GA17798@2ka.mipt.ru>; from johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru on Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:48:46AM +0400
Evgeniy,
I agree, even with constant source IP, the hash still should have
performed better (but didn't). Constant source IP and varying
port is a realistic data set for a port proxy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-31 4:29 Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn() Raghuram
2006-05-31 5:55 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 7:10 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 7:45 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 7:49 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 8:00 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 9:03 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 9:12 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 9:44 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 9:51 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 10:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 11:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 13:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 18:29 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 6:12 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 6:18 ` David Miller
2006-06-01 6:22 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 6:24 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 18:41 ` David Miller
2006-06-01 6:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 6:18 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 6:30 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 6:46 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 7:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 7:11 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 8:38 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 10:24 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 11:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 18:40 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 20:21 ` David Miller
2006-06-02 7:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-02 5:40 ` Florian Weimer
2006-06-02 7:48 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-02 15:10 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock [this message]
2006-06-02 17:26 ` Florian Weimer
2006-06-02 17:37 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 9:52 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 8:49 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 9:02 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 9:39 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060602091015.C18533@openss7.org \
--to=bidulock@openss7.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=draghuram@rocketmail.com \
--cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.