From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751368AbWFBSPV (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:15:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751407AbWFBSPV (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:15:21 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:59615 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751368AbWFBSPU (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:15:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 11:15:06 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: jbeulich@novell.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible Message-Id: <20060602111506.e97b2a71.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060602115709.GA29066@elte.hu> References: <448042C1.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <20060602115709.GA29066@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:57:09 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > hm, could you please merge this ontop of the stacktrace-output > beautification patch below that Andrew already has in his post-mm2 tree? Is OK - it's better that Jan's new patches apply directly to his present ones. I merged them in that order, fixed up the fallout.