From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>,
florin@iucha.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: pcmcia oops on 2.6.17-rc[12]
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 20:09:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060602190928.GI3100@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1148299804.17376.34.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:10:04PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2006-05-22 at 13:50 +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > The question I'm stuck with is: When is it valid to ask for a non-shared
> > IRQ, and get back a shared one.
>
> I don't think it is. The problem is that some PCMCIA drivers currently
> assume they can do so. The rules changed a bit over time on the hardware
> side.
As I've explained twice so far in this thread, this is not the case
with PCMCIA serial ports. We always request IRQs with SA_SHIRQ, unless
someone from userspace comes along and explicitly clears the "shared
interrupt" flag via setserial.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-23 19:22 pcmcia oops on 2.6.17-rc[12] Florin Iucha
2006-04-23 22:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-23 22:15 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-24 0:46 ` Florin Iucha
2006-05-08 14:56 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-05-08 15:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-08 16:34 ` Russell King
2006-05-15 22:07 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-15 22:00 ` Russell King
2006-05-18 11:10 ` Russell King
2006-05-15 22:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-15 23:00 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-15 23:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-15 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-16 0:17 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-16 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-16 1:18 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-16 15:16 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-22 11:50 ` Rogier Wolff
2006-05-22 12:10 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-22 21:27 ` Rogier Wolff
2006-05-22 22:38 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-02 19:09 ` Russell King [this message]
2006-05-22 15:06 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060602190928.GI3100@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de \
--cc=florin@iucha.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.