From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750868AbWFBUB2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 16:01:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751468AbWFBUB2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 16:01:28 -0400 Received: from 216-99-217-87.dsl.aracnet.com ([216.99.217.87]:48259 "EHLO sous-sol.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbWFBUB1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 16:01:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:02:44 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Jens Axboe Cc: Chris Wright , torvalds@osdl.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , Zwane Mwaikambo , Jeff Garzik , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Justin Forbes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wedgewood , Randy Dunlap , Mark Lord , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , stable@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [stable] Re: [PATCH 07/11] the latest consensus libata resume fix Message-ID: <20060602200244.GS18769@moss.sous-sol.org> References: <20060602194618.482948000@sous-sol.org> <20060602194742.420464000@sous-sol.org> <20060602195046.GO4400@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060602195046.GO4400@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de) wrote: > I'm not against the patch as such, but last I checked 2.6.16 actually > worked ok. The timer fixes in 2.6.17-rc is what apparently got the > resume breaking. > > So unless there's a bug report on 2.6.16.x for this, then it's a little > against the -stable rules to add it. We did get a report that this fix was needed, but I'm not 100% which kernel base the report was against. Marcel, were you testing on a 2.6.16 base, or 2.6.17-rc? thanks, -chris