From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltt-dev@shafik.org
Subject: Interrupts disabled for too long in printk
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 07:19:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060603111934.GA14581@Krystal> (raw)
Hi,
I ran some experiments with my kernel tracer (LTTng : http://ltt.polymtl.ca)
that showed missing interrupts. I wrote a small paper to show how to use my
tracer to solve this kind of problem which I presented at the CE Linux Form
last April.
http://tree.celinuxforum.org/CelfPubWiki/ELC2006Presentations?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=celf2006-desnoyers.pdf
It shows that, when the serial console is activated, the following code disables
interrupts for up to 15ms. On a system configured with a 250HZ timer (each 4ms),
it means that 3 scheduler ticks are lost.
In the current git :
kernel/printk.c: release_console_sem()
for ( ; ; ) {
-----> spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
wake_klogd |= log_start - log_end;
if (con_start == log_end)
break; /* Nothing to print */
_con_start = con_start;
_log_end = log_end;
con_start = log_end; /* Flush */
spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
call_console_drivers(_con_start, _log_end);
-----> local_irq_restore(flags);
}
I guess interrupts are disabled for a good reason (to protect this spinlock for
being taken by a nested interrupt handler. One way I am thinking to fix this
problem would be to do a spin try lock and fail if it is already taken.
Mathieu
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-03 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-03 11:19 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2006-06-03 21:43 ` Interrupts disabled for too long in printk Steven Rostedt
2006-06-08 1:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-06-08 1:37 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-08 2:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-06-08 2:35 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-08 10:24 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-06-08 14:38 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-08 15:17 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-06-08 15:45 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-08 18:34 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060603111934.GA14581@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@shafik.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.