All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	Linux Portal <linportal@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Declare explicit, hardware based lock ranking in serio
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 12:11:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606031211.42976.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149336677.3109.34.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

On Saturday 03 June 2006 08:11, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 07:56 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 June 2006 04:50, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > So we're taking ps2->cmd_mutex and then we're recurring back into
> > > > ps2_command() and then taking ps2->serio->cmd_mutex.
> > > > 
> > > > I suspect that's all correct/natural/expected and needs another
> > > > make-lockdep-shut-up patch.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The PS/2 code has a natural device order and there is a one level
> > > recursion in this device order in terms of the cmd_mutex; annotate 
> > > this explicit recursion as ok
> > > 
> > 
> > It is not necessarily single depth - one could have 2 or more pass-through
> > ports chained together, although currently in kernel we only have Synaptics
> > pass-through. If we were ever to implement pass-through port for IBMs
> > trackpoints then we'd have:
> > 
> > 	Synaptics<->pass-through<->TP<->pass-through<->some mouse
> 
> is there a bound to this? lockdep can deal with upto 8 or so
> recursions....
> 
 
Theoretically - no, practically - 2 as shown above. At the moment the
only devices that are using/may be using pass-through ports are Synaptics
touchpad and IBM trackpoint.

-- 
Dmitry

      reply	other threads:[~2006-06-03 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-02 16:53 Kernel lock bug detected (kseriod) Linux Portal
2006-06-02 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-03  1:52   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-06-03  8:50   ` [patch] Declare explicit, hardware based lock ranking in serio Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-03 11:56     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-06-03 12:11       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-03 16:11         ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200606031211.42976.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linportal@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.