From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 17:53:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060603215323.GA13077@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149345421.13993.81.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:37:01AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Couldn't it be possible to have the misrouted irq function mark the
> DISABLED_IRQ handlers as IRQ_PENDING? Then have the enable_irq that
> actually enables the irq to call the handlers with interrupts disabled
> if the IRQ_PENDING is set?
We still have the ambiguity with disable_irq. Really we need to have
disable_irq_handler(irq, handler)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-03 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-31 20:02 [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq() Ingo Molnar
2006-05-31 20:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-31 21:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-31 21:41 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-31 21:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-31 21:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-31 21:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-31 22:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-31 22:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-03 14:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-03 21:53 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2006-06-03 22:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-04 9:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-04 13:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-04 15:38 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-04 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-04 16:10 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-04 16:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-04 21:26 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-04 21:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-04 21:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-05 1:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-06 3:33 ` [PATCH -mm] misroute-irq: Don't call desc->chip->end because of edge interrupts Steven Rostedt
2006-06-06 4:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-06 10:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-06 8:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-06 10:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-06 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-06 21:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-06 3:49 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm] postpone misrouted irqs when disabled Steven Rostedt
2006-06-01 9:46 ` [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq() Alan Cox
2006-06-01 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060603215323.GA13077@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.