From: Kajetan Staszkiewicz <kajtek@biezanow.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ?
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:27:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606041827.10048.kajtek@biezanow.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5oqkf$9f8$1@sea.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1210 bytes --]
Dnia piątek, 2 czerwca 2006 13:09, Stefano Mainardi napisał(a):
> 2006/6/2, Jarek Poplawski <jarkap@poczta.onet.pl>:
> > Stefano Mainardi wrote:
> > > Hi to all,
> > > i'm following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is
> > > very detailed, but i'm a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of
> > > leaf classes.
> > >
> > > In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at
> > > message) in this way:
> > >
> > > # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo lmit 10
^^^^^
> >
> > rather that way:
> >
> > # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo limit 10
^^^^^
>
> therefore??? I do not understand ...
Well, pfifo is a discipline at the end of class, not the class.
I'm using sfq for every customer (the are limited to 256/384/512kbit), so they
will be able to use the Internet even when using p2p programs.
--
| pozdrawiam / greetings | powered by Trustix, Gentoo and FreeBSD |
| Kajetan Staszkiewicz | jabber,email,www: vegeta()tuxpowered net |
| Vegeta | IMQ devnames: http://www.tuxpowered.net |
`------------------------^------------------------------------------'
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-04 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-02 7:51 [LARTC] Re: For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ? Jarek Poplawski
2006-06-02 11:09 ` Stefano Mainardi
2006-06-04 16:27 ` Kajetan Staszkiewicz [this message]
2006-06-06 0:57 ` Damjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606041827.10048.kajtek@biezanow.net \
--to=kajtek@biezanow.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.