From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751399AbWFEUGZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:06:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751398AbWFEUGZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:06:25 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:63975 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751400AbWFEUGY (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:06:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:05:51 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: mbligh@google.com, akpm@osdl.org, apw@shadowen.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm3 Message-ID: <20060605200551.GA15560@elte.hu> References: <44845C27.3000006@google.com> <20060605194422.GB14709@elte.hu> <20060605130039.db1ac80c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060605130039.db1ac80c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5387] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > panic on NUMA-Q during LTP. Was fine in -mm2. > > > > > > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 22222232 > > > > > EIP is at check_deadlock+0x19/0xe1 > > > eax: 00000001 ebx: e4453030 ecx: 00000000 edx: e4008000 > > > esi: 22222222 edi: 00000001 ebp: 22222222 esp: e47ebec0 > > > > again these 0x22222222 entries on the stack. What on earth does this? > > Andy got a similar crash on x86_64, with a 0x2222222222222222 entry ... > > > > nothing of our magic values are 0x22 or 0x222222222. > > kernel/mutex-debug.c: > void debug_mutex_free_waiter(struct mutex_waiter *waiter) > { > DEBUG_WARN_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->list)); > memset(waiter, 0x22, sizeof(*waiter)); > } ah!!! that's indeed a hint. Will take a look tomorrow. Ingo