From: Hans-Christian Armingeon <mog.johnny@gmx.net>
To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 20:07:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606052008.00011.mog.johnny@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606051921.32725.mog.johnny@gmx.net>
Oh, sorry Keir,
I stumped in an old Bug.
I have rtc support in that kernel, and didn't remove /sbin/hwclock, so hwclock consumed all the time.
That was the issue.
Now the system performs normal.
What can I do to debug the problem with the irq? What does the
Sorry,
Johnny
Am Montag, 5. Juni 2006 19:21 schrieb Hans-Christian Armingeon:
> Am Montag, 5. Juni 2006 19:08 schrieben Sie:
> >
> > On 5 Jun 2006, at 17:58, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:
> >
> > > my system (dom0) is very slow, after the reboot with noirqdebug.
> > >
> > > The domU is very slow, too, and consumes a lot of cpu time.
> > >
> > > What can I do?
> >
> > Slower than booting without 'noirqdebug'?
>
> Yes. The domain with the device, that owns irq17 consumes very much cpu time, and makes a dual Opteron slow.
>
> >
> > If you boot without noirqdebug, how long does it take before domain0
> > complains about one of its irqs? Does it happen only after you have
> > started your driver domU?
>
> Well, soetimes it takes a few hours, up to a few days.
>
> Johnny
>
> >
> > -- Keir
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-05 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-03 12:51 irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-04 0:48 ` Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-04 8:03 ` Keir Fraser
2006-06-04 22:05 ` [Xen-devel] " Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-04 23:10 ` Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-05 7:51 ` [Xen-users] " Keir Fraser
2006-06-05 9:48 ` Re: [Xen-devel] " Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-05 12:57 ` [Xen-users] " Keir Fraser
2006-06-05 16:58 ` Re: [Xen-devel] " Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-05 17:08 ` [Xen-users] " Keir Fraser
2006-06-05 17:21 ` Re: [Xen-devel] " Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-05 17:44 ` [Xen-users] " Keir Fraser
2006-06-05 18:07 ` Hans-Christian Armingeon [this message]
2006-06-05 18:15 ` Keir Fraser
2006-06-13 8:26 ` Re: [Xen-devel] " Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-13 9:09 ` [Xen-users] " Keir Fraser
2006-06-13 9:21 ` Re: [Xen-devel] " Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-13 10:14 ` [Xen-users] " Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606052008.00011.mog.johnny@gmx.net \
--to=mog.johnny@gmx.net \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xen-users@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.