All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: "Undisclosed.Recipients": ;
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
	"John W. Linville"
	<linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RTF/RFC] bcm43xx: Enable local IRQs while executing periodic work
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:13:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606052113.31629.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060605185433.GF6068-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>

On Monday 05 June 2006 20:54, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:23:09PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> 
> > I would like to get this into wireless-2.6, but before that
> > happens I would like to have a few regression tests by people.
> > Please apply this and run high network traffic for 10-15 minutes.
> > Please enable kernel spinlock lockup and recursion detection
> > while testing.
> 
> It has almost been two weeks...do we want this patch, or not?

The two patches
[PATCH 1/2] bcm43xx: redesign locking
[PATCH 2/2] bcm43xx: preemptible periodic work
are the successors of it. ;) So, no, I don't want that old
and broken patch any longer.

But thanks that you asked. I forgot about it.

-- 
Greetings Michael.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-06-05 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-23 15:23 [PATCH, RTF/RFC] bcm43xx: Enable local IRQs while executing periodic work Michael Buesch
2006-06-05 18:54 ` John W. Linville
     [not found]   ` <20060605185433.GF6068-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2006-06-05 19:13     ` Michael Buesch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200606052113.31629.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb-fseuscv1ubazqb+pc5nmwq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.