From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damjan Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:57:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: For leaf classes is best PFIFO or SFQ? Message-Id: <20060606005732.GA20188@legolas.on.net.mk> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org > Well, pfifo is a discipline at the end of class, not the class. > > I'm using sfq for every customer (the are limited to 256/384/512kbit), so they > will be able to use the Internet even when using p2p programs. But p2p programs create a lot of connection flows, so statistically SFQ will give the p2p a lot more traffic to them, compared to just several flows for "normal" trafic like http, pop3 and smtp. Or you're doing something else too? -- damjan | дамјан This is my jabber ID --> damjan@bagra.net.mk -- not my mail address, it's a Jabber ID --^ :) _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc