From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Joachim Fritschi <jfritschi@freenet.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Twofish cipher - x86_64 assembler
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 01:35:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606060135.26823.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606051206.50085.jfritschi@freenet.de>
On Monday 05 June 2006 12:06, Joachim Fritschi wrote:
> On Sunday 04 June 2006 21:10, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 June 2006 15:16, Joachim Fritschi wrote:
> > > This patch adds the twofish x86_64 assembler routine.
> > >
> > > Changes since last version:
> > > - The keysetup is now handled by the twofish_common.c (see patch 1 )
> > > - The last round of the encrypt/decrypt routines where optimized saving 5
> > > instructions.
> > >
> > > Correctness was verified with the tcrypt module and automated test
> > > scripts.
> >
> > Do you have some benchmark numbers that show that it's actually worth
> > it?
>
> Here are the outputs from the tcrypt speedtests. They haven't changed much
> since the last patch:
Ok thanks. I've tried to apply the patches, but can't because they're
word wrapped. Can you please resend and do a test send to yourself first,
checking that the patch can be really applied.
> There might be some way to further improve readability but i have not found
> any other way. I'm open to suggestions :)
Sounds reasonable. Best you just fix the comment to say that this convention is needed
for the macros.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-05 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-04 13:16 [PATCH 4/4] Twofish cipher - x86_64 assembler Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-04 19:10 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-04 21:01 ` Dag Arne Osvik
2006-06-05 10:18 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-05 22:28 ` Dag Arne Osvik
2006-06-05 22:44 ` Dag Arne Osvik
2006-06-07 19:16 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-05 10:06 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-05 17:44 ` dean gaudet
2006-06-05 19:46 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-05 23:35 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-06-07 19:21 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-07 19:38 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-16 12:00 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-17 10:38 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-19 14:13 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-20 11:14 ` Herbert Xu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-08 7:13 linux
2006-06-08 17:35 ` Joachim Fritschi
2006-06-09 1:13 ` linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606060135.26823.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jfritschi@freenet.de \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.