From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750916AbWFGInY (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 04:43:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750935AbWFGInY (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 04:43:24 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:14785 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750916AbWFGInX (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 04:43:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:42:47 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Daniel Walker Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: genirq Message-ID: <20060607084246.GA31896@elte.hu> References: <20060604135011.decdc7c9.akpm@osdl.org> <20060606144242.GB29798@elte.hu> <1149613010.15050.1.camel@c-67-180-134-207.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1149613010.15050.1.camel@c-67-180-134-207.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -3.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-3.1 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Daniel Walker wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 16:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > there hasnt been any real problem since the MSI one. The core bits are > > rather stable. The patch-queue had positive input from the maintainers > > of the two architectures with the most complex IRQ hardware (arm and > > ppc*), and that's reassuring. But in any case, other architectures are > > not affected at all (sans brow paperbag build bugs and typos), their > > __do_IRQ() handling remains unchanged. So i'd like to see this in > > 2.6.18. (there a good deal of stuff we have ontop of genirq) > > There was a problem reported by Kevin Hillman , the -v5 version was > not functional on ARM omap boards .. Was that handled already in -v6? Daniel - you should be aware that the -mm genirq lineup does _not_ include the ARM bits. Those changes go via the normal ARM QA and merge path, i.e. via rmk. The -mm lineup only includes the generic bits (for type-based platforms). In any case, they dont impact upstream genirq merging plans. (The omap thing in the armirq queue is likely some small thing. Thomas is checking it.) Ingo