All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	"Garzik, Jeff" <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Brandeburg,
	Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	"Kok, Auke" <auke@foo-projects.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 11:48:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060607164801.GX24227@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060607150522.GA24608@hmsreliant.homelinux.net>

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:05:22AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >  
> > > Matt, any ideas on this?
> > 
> > Not at the moment.
> 
> how about this for a solution?  It doesn't make netpoll any more robust, but I
> think in the interests of efficiency it would be fair to require that, when
> netpolled, a driver must receive frames on the same net device for which it was
> polled.  With this patch we detect that condition and handle it accordingly in
> e1000_intr.  This eliminates the need for us to call the clean_rx method from
> the poll_controller when napi is configured, instead allowing the poll method to
> be called from napi_poll, as the netpoll model currently does.  This fixes the
> netdump regression, and eliminates the layering violation and the potential race
> that we've been discussing.  I've just tested it with netdump here and it works
> quite well.
> 
> Thoughts appreciated.

This looks pretty reasonable, mostly from the perspective that it
doesn't put any further ugliness in netpoll. We might want to add a
comment somewhere in netpoll of the new rule we're now observing.
I'll let the e1000 guys comment on the particulars of the driver change.

> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-07 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-05 23:09 [PATCH 0/2] e1000: fixes for netpoll+NAPI, ARM Kok, Auke
2006-06-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI Kok, Auke
2006-06-06 13:52   ` Neil Horman
2006-06-06 16:39     ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-06 17:05       ` Neil Horman
2006-06-06 17:18         ` Auke Kok
2006-06-06 17:30           ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-06 17:34             ` Auke Kok
2006-06-06 17:42               ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-06 23:17                 ` Matt Mackall
2006-06-07 15:05                   ` Neil Horman
2006-06-07 16:48                     ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2006-06-07 18:25                       ` Auke Kok
2006-06-07 18:44                         ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-07 19:18                           ` Neil Horman
2006-06-08 17:19                           ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-08 17:29                             ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-12  0:13                               ` Neil Horman
2006-06-12 16:42                                 ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-12 18:06                                   ` Neil Horman
2006-06-14 20:41                                     ` Neil Horman
2006-06-14 23:44                                       ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-15 12:44                                         ` John W. Linville
2006-06-15 20:45                                           ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-20  8:28                                             ` Andrew Grover
2006-06-07 18:54                         ` John W. Linville
2006-06-08 17:23                           ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-08 18:39                             ` John W. Linville
2006-06-06 17:29       ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] e1000: remove risky prefetch on next_skb->data Kok, Auke
2006-06-05 23:21   ` Rick Jones
2006-06-06  0:12     ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2006-06-06  0:16       ` Rick Jones
2006-06-06  0:22         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06  0:26         ` Brandeburg, Jesse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060607164801.GX24227@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=auke@foo-projects.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=mitch.a.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.