From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965099AbWFICo6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:44:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965105AbWFICo6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:44:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.enter.net ([216.193.128.24]:47118 "EHLO smtp.enter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965099AbWFICo6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:44:58 -0400 From: Daniel Hazelton To: "Antonino A. Daplas" Subject: Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:44:49 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Helge Hafting , Jon Smirl , Dave Airlie , Ondrej Zajicek , Pavel Machek , Alan Cox , Kyle Moffett , Manu Abraham , linux cbon , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060519224056.37429.qmail@web26611.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <200606080341.00382.dhazelton@enter.net> <4487E034.8010808@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4487E034.8010808@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606082244.50484.dhazelton@enter.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 08 June 2006 04:30 am, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > Daniel Hazelton wrote: > > On Thursday 08 June 2006 03:02 am, Helge Hafting wrote: > >> Jon Smirl wrote: > >>> On 6/1/06, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Okay. I'll stick this on my list. Shouldn't be too hard to get to, > > provided I can finish up my work on drmcon. (Tony, I'm still waiting on > > that unloadable fbcon/fbdev bit and the userspace fbdev driver you > > mentioned) > > I already have a preliminary patch that allows the binding and unbinding > of fbcon which I sent to lkml and fbdev-devel. Jon and Andrew are against > having the control in fbcon, so I'm currently working on another patch > that will transfer the control to the console layer. It was a bit more > complicated that what I thought, but I'm almost done. I'm just in > debugging mode, and so far I haven't encountered any major problems. Gotcha. Not having control in fbcon? Understandable. I don't think vgacon has that control in it, and see no reason for it to be in fbcon either. > The nice thing about this change is that it's not restricted to fbcon. > Other console drivers can explicitly bind or unbind, ie, your future > drmcon. Now this is a good reason to put the binding/unbinding control in another place. I had already thought that re-initializing vgacon on an error condition would be the best way to get the message to the screen. Having the console binding/unbinding code in a generic layer will make this very easy. > I may send out the patch within a day or 2. After this, I'll start work on > the userland driver. > > Tony Thanks Tony. I'll get my nose back into drmcon and see if I can't get it into shape soon myself. DRH