From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030288AbWFISuw (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:50:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030387AbWFISuw (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:50:52 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:55917 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030288AbWFISuv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:50:51 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JFKRLrZ8pWQZ6Epa7vDZe8OTVZyxd2HSNapXQpsICKDh/st2KeS/LRpepG1gSvMlugg8zn4AOiRHC8uPnajL8IgKSJoPW2H0E2GmWlFqsxUT+Qwzot/xradlgwjgPOVu0JmN5PY63OAETZwz/9/aLF6uWtqVLtE3xUktW7SnTIw= Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:50:00 +0200 From: Diego Calleja To: Alex Tomas Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, adilger@clusterfs.com, alex@clusterfs.com, jeff@garzik.org, akpm@osdl.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Message-Id: <20060609205000.fce57f54.diegocg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org> <20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <20060609181020.GB5964@schatzie.adilger.int> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org El Fri, 09 Jun 2006 22:30:20 +0400, Alex Tomas escribió: > LT> See? ext3 would become strictly _worse_ for the majority of users, who > LT> wouldn't get any advantage. That's my point. > > would "#if CONFIG_EXT3_EXTENTS" be a good solution then? Not at all, a config option may be disabled by lots of distros and make backwards compatibility even more difficult than is already going to be. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diego Calleja Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:50:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20060609205000.fce57f54.diegocg@gmail.com> References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org> <20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <20060609181020.GB5964@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, adilger@clusterfs.com, alex@clusterfs.com, jeff@garzik.org, akpm@osdl.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]:59245 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030382AbWFISuv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:50:51 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id h2so1186178ugf for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:50:49 -0700 (PDT) To: Alex Tomas In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org El Fri, 09 Jun 2006 22:30:20 +0400, Alex Tomas escribi=F3: > LT> See? ext3 would become strictly _worse_ for the majority of user= s, who=20 > LT> wouldn't get any advantage. That's my point. >=20 > would "#if CONFIG_EXT3_EXTENTS" be a good solution then? Not at all, a config option may be disabled by lots of distros and make backwards compatibility even more difficult than is already going to be. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html