Re: netif_tx_disable vs netif_stop_queue (possible races?)

[Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>]

On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:42:21PM +0100, Daniel Drake (dsd@gentoo.org) wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> >Correct.  All callers of hard_start_xmit do so under RCU or equivalent
> >locks so they must be complete by the time synchronize_net() returns.
> 
> Does this hold for other operations? Such as:
> 
> - The netdev->set_mac_address function
> - The wireless ioctl's (SIOCSIWESSID, etc)
> 
> Are these also guaranteed to have returned after synchronize_net()?

None of above calls is protected with RCU (except set_mac_address()
called through ioctl, which is performed under read_lock which disables
preemtption), so they still can run after synchronize_net().

But if you are talking about synchronize_net() inside
unregister_netdevice(), which is called from 
usbnet_disconnect()->unregister_netdev(), than it is safe.

> Thanks,
> Daniel

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov