From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750916AbWFLJJp (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 05:09:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751130AbWFLJJp (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 05:09:45 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:61346 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750916AbWFLJJo (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 05:09:44 -0400 X-Authenticated: #428038 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:09:32 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: David Miller Cc: rlrevell@joe-job.com, folkert@vanheusden.com, matti.aarnio@zmailer.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) Message-ID: <20060612090932.GF11649@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Miller , rlrevell@joe-job.com, folkert@vanheusden.com, matti.aarnio@zmailer.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060610222734.GZ27502@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <20060611160243.GH20700@vanheusden.com> <1150048497.14253.140.camel@mindpipe> <20060611.115430.112290058.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060611.115430.112290058.davem@davemloft.net> X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-2006-06-08 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Bcc'ing David Relson to protect his mail address from the usual vger flamewars.) On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, David Miller wrote: > To be honest I'm all for some kind of bayesian filter at vger as long > as the rejected postings go somewhere into a folder I can scan every > couple of days looking for false positives. I suggest to try out bogofilter and spamprobe. Either lets YOU decide what to do with its finding if it's spam or ham. bogofilter or spamprobe works together with some filter like procmail or maildrop and you code what happens with message that is "Spam", "Ham" or "Unsure", and you can even look at the numeric value from 0 (ham) to 1 (spam) and decide. The default install suggests an "unsure" range that you can also manually look at. Spamprobe also works rather well for many, although I don't know much about its details today, haven't followed it for many months. -- Matthias Andree