All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:33:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060612233331.GA3924@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606121307.54556.ak@suse.de>

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:07:54PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Hallo,
> 
> Some administrativa.
> 
> In the last time I've posted all patches I sent to Linus
> at discuss@x86-64.org at least once. I did this because this list is relatively 
> low volume and I tended to get some useful feedback from the people
> subscribed here.
> 
> However I heard some rumours that I scared people away 
> from the list with the many patches.  
> 
> I also planned to post patches more often to get better
> turnaround for reviews on changed patches.
> 
> We still have a patches@x86-64 mailing list on x86-64.org which
> is mostly unused. If I moved the big patch floods over there,
> would the people who do reviews subscribe there? Please comment.

Given a choice I prefer one list for patches and discussion.  Patches on a 
separate  list will eventually result in discussions of those patches on that 
list, and might even leave out interested parties out of the ensuing discussion.
My 2c;  If a separate patch list is needed for staging patches to mainline, it 
could be something like mm-commits - a broadcast only list by the
maintainer.

Thanks,
Kiran

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-06-12 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-12 11:07 x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases Andi Kleen
2006-06-12 11:18 ` [discuss] " Jan Beulich
2006-06-12 14:05 ` Chris Schlaeger
2006-06-12 23:33 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2006-06-13  0:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-13  8:02 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-06-17 17:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-18  7:35   ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-12 14:11 [discuss] " Langsdorf, Mark
2006-06-12 15:44 ` Randy.Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060612233331.GA3924@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.