From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Massimiliano Hofer Subject: Re: [PATCH] entry_data Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 22:56:09 +0200 Message-ID: <200606132256.10384.max@nucleus.it> References: <200606050029.08602.max@nucleus.it> <200606121445.42157.max@nucleus.it> <448ED795.3010509@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Pablo Neira Ayuso In-Reply-To: <448ED795.3010509@netfilter.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 13 June 2006 5:19 pm, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > static int > > match(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *in, > > - const struct net_device *out, const void *matchinfo, int offset, > > - unsigned int protoff, int *hotdrop) > > + const struct net_device *out, const struct xt_match *match, > > + const void *matchinfo, int offset, > > + unsigned int protoff, int *hotdrop, void *entry_data) > > Hm, then you must have a patch to modify the interface match()? Of course. I sent a patch in the previous message: https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2006-June/024656.html The patches are available here: https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/attachments/20060605/94b0d808/2.6.17-rc5-entry_data_core-0001.bin https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/attachments/20060605/94b0d808/2.6.17-rc5-entry_data_matches-0001.bin -- Bye, Massimiliano Hofer