From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030284AbWFOMDi (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:03:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030283AbWFOMDi (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:03:38 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:5762 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030279AbWFOMDh (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:03:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:03:36 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Roman Zippel Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h Message-ID: <20060615120336.GQ27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20060615111126.GJ27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:46:55PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Al Viro wrote: > > > bfset and friends need "o", not "m" - they don't work with autodecrement > > memory arguments. bitops.h had it fixed, signal.h hadn't... > > I have a better version for this one pending, which I have queued for > 2.6.18. Could you post it?