From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH][1/2] Clarify cpu_family statements Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:47:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20060620054749.GC6091@redhat.com> References: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A8430564A36C@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A8430564A36C@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Langsdorf, Mark" Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:30:17AM -0500, Langsdorf, Mark wrote: > This patch clarfies the meaning of the cpu_family if > statements in the hw pstate driver patch for powernow-k8 > > -Mark Langsdorf > AMD, Inc. > > (inline and attached because my mailer is very braindead) Very. MIME confuses the bejesus out of git-apply unless you kill off every trace of it. Still, I managed to fight your mail headers and get them to apply. Both diffs will be in 2.6.18 Thanks, Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk