From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fsbax-0004Nz-Kd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:28:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fsbat-0004LW-IB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:28:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fsbat-0004LP-F1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:28:19 -0400 Received: from [193.7.176.20] (helo=bender.bawue.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1FsblN-0001Yo-2k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:39:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:28:03 +0100 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mips-user socket-related syscall support Message-ID: <20060620082802.GH24070@networkno.de> References: <449667B1.5070300@twilight-hall.net> <44971F2A.9050004@bellard.org> <44979BB4.5060703@twilight-hall.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <44979BB4.5060703@twilight-hall.net> From: Thiemo Seufer Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Rapha=EBl Rigo wrote: > Fabrice Bellard wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Is it really needed to duplicate socket.h ? What are the differences for > > mips ? > >=20 > > Regards, > >=20 > > Fabrice. > >=20 > Hi, > almost all socket related constants are different on MIPS. I thought it w= ould be > cleaner to define all constants for each target, so that if we add suppo= rt for > another platform with different constants, it will be easy. Historically Linux/MIPS followed MIPS Inc.'s RiscOS numbering scheme, this explains most of the seemingly deliberate deviations from i386. Thiemo