From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751937AbWFUCdv (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:33:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751936AbWFUCdi (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:33:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:64212 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751937AbWFUCdN (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:33:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:32:33 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev To: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" Cc: rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, gregkh@suse.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, zaitcev@redhat.com Subject: Re: Serial-Core: USB-Serial port current issues. Message-Id: <20060620193233.15224308.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20060620161134.20c1316e@doriath.conectiva> References: <20060613192829.3f4b7c34@home.brethil> <20060614152809.GA17432@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20060620161134.20c1316e@doriath.conectiva> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.3 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:11:34 -0300, "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" wrote: > Pete, was it your original idea to completely move from the spinlock > to a mutex? I thought it was the cleanest solution. But perhaps I miss something. I'll look at your reposted patch again, maybe it's all right as it is. -- Pete