From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Massimiliano Hofer Subject: Re: [PATCH] priv_data (formerly entry_data) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:45:25 +0200 Message-ID: <200606210245.26564.max@nucleus.it> References: <200606050029.08602.max@nucleus.it> <200606210203.33209.max@nucleus.it> <44989321.2000106@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <44989321.2000106@trash.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 21 June 2006 2:30 am, Patrick McHardy wrote: > I think this should be done somewhere in x_tables. I think I would > rename xt_check_match to xt_init_match, put the allocation there > and finally rename ->checkentry to ->init .. the name doesn't really > fit anymore since people started doing real initialization in there, > and changing prototypes is a good opportunity for fixing that. I was wandering why it was duplicated between IPv4 and IPv6. Are these changes planned for 2.6.18? -- Saluti, Massimiliano Hofer