From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?q?Rafa=C5=82_Cygnarowski?= Subject: Re: tcp/ip + samba + dosemu Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:22:48 +0200 Message-ID: <200606230822.48718.zswi@pers.pl> References: <200606201508.12819.rafi@pers.pl> <200606221942.15850.zswi@pers.pl> <449B164E.30308@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <449B164E.30308@pobox.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: dosEmu-list > > Now my problem is to get to those files in a safe way > > (which seems to be using smb client under dos - of course end point= s run > > linux so dos have to run under dosemu). > > Why is it not safe to run samba client under Linux? and doseemu on to= p > of that? Locks are not "inherited". When dos under dosemu try to lock file or re= gion=20 of file these locks are not passed to samba server. > > I have similar configurations already > > running, but I use Novell Netware (and MarsNW) with ipx and Novell > > Client. Unfrotunatelly this time I can't use Novell and have to sol= ve > > dosemu to samba connectivity problem. > > What go wrong if you use a linux-samba client on every machine and us= e > dosemu with lredir? Have you tried it? I use http://www.burtonsys.com/download/TESTLOCK.ZIP for lock tests. Re= sults=20 of such solution are below: test =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0result =C2=A0 (test description) ------- =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ------- =C2=A0-----------------------------------= ------------------ Test #1 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Passed. =C2=A0(Creating & modifying & deleting fi= les) Test #2 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED! =C2=A0(Examining & modifying file attribu= tes) Test #3 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED! =C2=A0(Enforced exclusive access, and sha= re errors) Test #4 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Passed. =C2=A0(Shared read access to files) Test #5 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED! =C2=A0(Shared modify access to files) Test #6 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Passed. =C2=A0(File commit) Test #7 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED! =C2=A0(File region locking, and lock erro= rs) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Test #8 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 not run =C2=A0(Adjacent region locks, and lock/wr= ite conflicts) Test #9 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Passed. =C2=A0(Appending & verifying new file siz= es [NT 3.5 bug]) Test #10 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Passed. =C2=A0(Appending & verifying file sizes w= / closes) Test #11 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Passed. =C2=A0(Appending & verifying file sizes w= / file commits) Semaphore =C2=A0 Passed. =C2=A0(semaphore-file kludge) Test #3-A =C2=A0 Passed. =C2=A0(Enforced exclusive access & share error= s, 2-session) Test #5&6-A FAILED! =C2=A0(Shared modify access & file commit, 2-sessio= n) Test #7-A =C2=A0 FAILED! =C2=A0(File region locking, 2-session) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The same test on the same resource with client directly connected to sa= mba=20 (eg. on XP) passes all tests. --=20 Rafa=C5=82, Cygnarowski rafi@pers.pl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html