All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: stsp@aknet.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the creation of boot_cpu_init() is wrong and accessing uninitialised data
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:04:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060626200433.bf0292af.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151376313.3443.12.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:45:13 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:

> The basic problem with this function is that on most architectures
> smp_processor_id() is an alias for current_thread_info()->cpu which
> isn't given its correct value until setup_arch(), so adding a
> boot_cpu_init() that uses it *before* setup_arch() is called is plain
> wrong.  You manage to get away with it 99% of the time because its
> uninitialised value is zero and mostly the id of the booting CPU is
> zero ... but guess who's got a box currently booting on CPU 1 with no
> CPU 0?

preexisting bug, really.  printk() uses smp_processor_id().  Things like
spin_lock() will probably do so in certain debug modes.  We finally got
caught.

> Unfortunately, I can't think of a good solution for what you want to do.
> The thing that looks most plausible is hard_smp_processor_id() which
> reads the actual register value of the processor id.  However, on x86
> (and any other architectures that renumber their CPUs in setup_arch())
> this will ultimately turn out wrong again.

I think arch code should do it before calling start_kernel(), really.  It's
just such a basic part of the kernel framework.

A less wholesome but perhaps simpler solution would be to call the new
setup_smp_processor_id() on entry to start_kernel().


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-27  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-27  2:45 the creation of boot_cpu_init() is wrong and accessing uninitialised data James Bottomley
2006-06-27  3:04 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-06-27  3:36   ` James Bottomley
2006-06-27  5:03     ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-27 13:00       ` Keith Owens
2006-06-27 14:01         ` James Bottomley
2006-06-27 14:49       ` James Bottomley
2006-06-28  0:04         ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-28  2:45           ` James Bottomley
2006-06-28  2:57             ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-28 23:10               ` James Bottomley
2006-06-29 16:58                 ` James Bottomley
2006-07-02 14:52                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-02 15:06                     ` James Bottomley
2006-07-02 15:37                       ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060626200433.bf0292af.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stsp@aknet.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.