From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Viro Subject: Re: Logging failed open() calls on /var/log/audit/audit.log Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:03:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20060627220323.GK4199@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20060627211553.GA11601@zk3.dec.com> <200606271721.05626.sgrubb@redhat.com> <44A1A4EB.6040205@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44A1A4EB.6040205@hp.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Linda Knippers Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:36:43PM -0400, Linda Knippers wrote: > Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 17:15, Amy Griffis wrote: > > > >>If you would like to see a record in this case, you must add a watch > >>for /var/log/audit. > > > > > > I don't see a record watching this either. > > I think we're missing the directory lookup syscall(s) on watches > right now. Careful - that's one hell of a hot path. Note that we'll get many of those for each syscall that does pathname resolution; moreover, when we hit dcache, we should be careful about blocking.