From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Fix UML build on i386 Ubuntu Dapper
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:47:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060628004756.GC4488@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060627183128.GA4488@us.ibm.com>
On 27.06.2006 [11:31:28 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 27.06.2006 [16:56:13 +0200], Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 00:02, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > Hi Jeff,
> > >
> > > I run an x86_64 kernel with i386 userspace (Ubuntu Dapper) and decided
> > > to try out UML today. I found that UML wasn't quite aware of biarch
> > > compilers (which Ubuntu i386 ships). A fix similar to what was done for
> > > x86_64 should probably be committed (see
> > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113425940204010&w=2).
> >
> > Ok, it seemed strange but I understand the stuff... that's very
> > interesting as this is the setup I'd wished to have since ages. I'll
> > switch to it ASAP...
>
> Indeed :)
>
> > > Without the FLAGS changes, the build will fail at a number of places and
> > > without the LINK change, the final link will fail.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
> >
> > The first hunk (#undef i386) should be unnecessary given you specify
> > -m64 (add it to CPPFLAGS too). Also it can/could be problematic for
Hrm, I somehow overlooked the CPPFLAGS bit. Is it necessary? That wasn't
changed for x86_64 and having not changed it for UML, it doesn't appear
to have prevented the build from working on both x86_64 and i386
SUBARCHs here.
Thanks,
Nish
--
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-28 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-26 22:02 [uml-devel] [PATCH] Fix UML build on i386 Ubuntu Dapper Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-06-27 14:56 ` Blaisorblade
2006-06-27 18:31 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-06-28 0:47 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2006-06-28 10:13 ` Blaisorblade
2006-06-29 20:56 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-06-29 21:49 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-07-07 0:52 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-30 0:29 ` Paolo Giarrusso
2006-06-30 1:05 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-28 2:11 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-28 2:54 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2006-06-28 3:43 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-28 3:50 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060628004756.GC4488@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.