From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750742AbWF2NL4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:11:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750758AbWF2NL4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:11:56 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:37545 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750742AbWF2NLz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:11:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hp61ILKQ193grfVf5pOUAcI3MsQv1K3CXCPRyaHa3EcVjh1wmMDdxSaK0uQ6OBpDePmy/Ph40BhUMK8DEm7AqK9sJvQCtEJCNY0RP/cbr/sC4NE6eDJ9XeeS8lTuqDuZ22NwVVd527XHV5EsL3wKVouLvLU5Sde4ILJcfvl8nUs= Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:11:55 +0200 From: Paolo Ornati To: Paolo Ornati Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , trivial@kernel.org, Alistair John Strachan , jensmh@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove duplicate cleanups Message-ID: <20060629151155.5609d59f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060629134002.1b06257c@localhost> References: <20060629134002.1b06257c@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:40:02 +0200 Paolo Ornati wrote: > Remove every (hopefully) duplicated word under Documentation/. > > Examples: > "and and" --> "and" > "in in" --> "in" > ... I've re-read the whole thing and found these, please comment: -------- diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/videobook.tmpl b/Documentation/DocBook/videobook.tmpl index fdff984..d19ccee 100644 --- a/Documentation/DocBook/videobook.tmpl +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/videobook.tmpl @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int radio_ioctl(struct video_devi typeThis reports the capabilities of the device, and - matches the field we filled in in the struct + matches the field we filled in the struct video_device when registering. ------------ I'm not 100% sure of this. ----------------- diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt index 0d189c9..9adc500 100644 --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Do not modify the syntax of boot loader need or coordination with . Note that ALL kernel parameters listed below are CASE SENSITIVE, and that -a trailing = on the name of any parameter states that that parameter will +a trailing = on the name of any parameter states that parameter will be entered as an environment variable, whereas its absence indicates that it will appear as a kernel argument readable via /proc/cmdline by programs running once the system is up. ------------------------------- The old one looks correct. --------------------------------------------- Life isn't quite as simple as it may appear above, however: for while the -caches are expected to be coherent, there's no guarantee that that coherency +caches are expected to be coherent, there's no guarantee that coherency will be ordered. This means that whilst changes made on one CPU will eventually become visible on all CPUs, there's no guarantee that they will become apparent in the same order on those other CPUs. --------------------------------------------------- Not sure. ----------------------------------------- --- a/Documentation/networking/pt.txt +++ b/Documentation/networking/pt.txt @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ recompile it. The driver is not real good at the moment for finding the card. You can 'help' it by changing the order of the potential addresses in the structure -found in the pt_init() function so the address of where the card is is put +found in the pt_init() function so the address of where the card is put first. ------------------------------------------ The old one looks correct. -- Paolo Ornati Linux 2.6.17.1 on x86_64