From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750733AbWF2OGQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:06:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750724AbWF2OGP (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:06:15 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:20783 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750733AbWF2OGO (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:06:14 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Qp2GqSUJdOSrpsfNeGdI4kNC2t2isM5ath6hIWv+nMqamP3mzOfUnKdQrSYBgrJuqmtAsQ69wH0yJdHwNyuTW4kmUxwbVlB14aCvsbrZtXkJdVj/yQNeszOGvMmJ2BuffiHeSWnwCV9BBDVCiJ98pEmQIQ3zNmbNV0XX2E0X4lc= Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:06:11 +0200 From: Paolo Ornati To: Alistair John Strachan Cc: jensmh@gmx.de, Linux Kernel Mailing List , trivial@kernel.org, Paolo Ornati Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove duplicate cleanups Message-ID: <20060629160611.73a90bf2@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200606291435.39879.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> References: <20060629134002.1b06257c@localhost> <200606291339.11733.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <20060629150545.167c0abb@localhost> <200606291435.39879.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:35:39 +0100 Alistair John Strachan wrote: > Actually the context made me think otherwise, look: > > "Otherwise, statistics (average think time, average seek distance) on **the** > process that submitted the just completed.." "the process" and "that process" are in two different periods, doesn't it matter? Otherwise, statistics (average think time, average seek distance) on **the process** that submitted the just completed request are examined**.** If it seems -likely that **that process** will submit another request soon, and that In the second period "that process" refers clearly to "the process" defined in the first period, while "process" looks pretty generic. No? -- Paolo Ornati Linux 2.6.17.1 on x86_64