From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Prasanna Panchamukhi <prasanna@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.17-rt1 : fix x86_64 oops
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:32:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060629163236.GD1294@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060629142442.GA11546@elte.hu>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 04:24:42PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > OK, I need to catch up, but I see a lot of oops while running
> > rcutorture in my box (rt1). I am investigating this atm.
>
> fyi, 2.6.17-mm4 throws tons of these:
>
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: rcu_torture_rea/0x00010000/1471
> [<c0106123>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
> [<c010613d>] dump_stack+0x17/0x1a
> [<c123b4e2>] schedule+0x61/0xc61
> [<c015f380>] rcu_torture_reader+0x12e/0x17e
> [<c014101f>] kthread+0xc4/0xf0
> [<c0102005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
Probably the fault of my new ops-ization of rcutorture.c. :-/
(For whatever it is worth, Dipankar would still be using the older
non-ops-ized version of rcutorture.c.)
Did you get these oopses with default setting of torture_type, or did you
specify torture_type=rcu_bh or torture_type=srcu to the modprobe command?
This was on i386, x86_64, or on something else?
Ah! This would have been a CONFIG_PREEMPT build, right?
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-29 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-27 20:01 2.6.17-rt1 : x86_64 oops Dipankar Sarma
2006-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH] 2.6.17-rt1 : fix " Dipankar Sarma
2006-06-28 19:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-28 20:02 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-06-29 14:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-29 16:32 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2006-06-29 19:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-06-29 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-29 21:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-07-03 16:57 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-07-04 4:15 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-07-04 6:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-04 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-05 9:11 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-07-26 7:36 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-07-06 20:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060629163236.GD1294@us.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.