From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Longhaul - infrastructure(?) proposal Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:28:09 -0400 Message-ID: <20060629192809.GC2067@redhat.com> References: <44A3EC2F.7040909@interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44A3EC2F.7040909@interia.pl> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWC?= Bilski Cc: Dave Jones , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 05:05:19PM +0200, Rafa=C5=82 Bilski wrote: > Hello! >=20 > In case that flushing and disabling caches will not work. > It is possible that I do above in wrong way. > Would this code below be acceptable as infrastructure? > Is this infrastructure or maybe hack? > This is draft/proposal. > Can I continue in this way or I shouldn't? I suggest to keep talking with Greg, as any work on quiescing dma will need cooperation from both USB & PCI layers, and he's one of the more knowledgable people in the area of the driver model. Dave --=20 http://www.codemonkey.org.uk