From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: RDMA will be reverted
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 16:26:04 +0200
Message-ID: <200607011626.04539.ak@suse.de>
References: <adawtazgawi.fsf@cisco.com> <20060630.141658.34759102.davem@davemloft.net> <1151708503.11835.8.camel@trinity.ogc.int>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, rdreier@cisco.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:400 "EHLO mx1.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750753AbWGAO0Z (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 1 Jul 2006 10:26:25 -0400
To: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
In-Reply-To: <1151708503.11835.8.camel@trinity.ogc.int>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Saturday 01 July 2006 01:01, Tom Tucker wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 14:16 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> 
> > The TOE folks have tried to submit their hooks and drivers
> > on several occaisions, and we've rejected it every time.
> 
> iWARP != TOE

Perhaps a good start of that discussion David asked for would 
be if you could give us an overview of the differences
and how you avoid the TOE problems.

-Andi