From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] Longhaul - I missed that Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 02:53:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20060707065330.GB27347@redhat.com> References: <44AE03BA.5040901@interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44AE03BA.5040901@interia.pl> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWC?= Bilski Cc: Dave Jones , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:48:26AM +0200, Rafa=C5=82 Bilski wrote: > This should be in "Use hardware support". Without this=20 > longhaul will always fail when compiled into kernel.=20 > I lost this when I was splitting patches. Sorry. Ah yes, because the acpi processor module won't have initialised I assume ? Applied, thanks. Dave --=20 http://www.codemonkey.org.uk