From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Xen Management API Draft, version 0.4
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:19:34 +0100
Message-ID: <20060707131934.GA24259@leeni.uk.xensource.com>
References: <20060703155332.GA5002@leeni.uk.xensource.com>
	<1152278206.7717.47.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1152278206.7717.47.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Harry Butterworth <harry@hebutterworth.freeserve.co.uk>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 02:16:45PM +0100, Harry Butterworth wrote:

> I may be misreading the document but it seems to me like you've
> constrained the class definition such that all of the construtor
> parameters have accessor methods.
> 
> I think this may be a bit unnatural and I think any required accessor
> methods for constructor parameters are just a special case of accessor
> methods required in general and they in turn are just a special case of
> general purpose methods like the ones required to drive the vm
> lifecycle.

You've lost me.  Could you give an example?

Ewan.