From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1030331AbWGHUW4@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1030331AbWGHUW4 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:22:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030337AbWGHUWz
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:22:55 -0400
Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:20415 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030338AbWGHUWy (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:22:54 -0400
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:23:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3
Cc: "Sunil Kumar" <devsku@gmail.com>, "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
       "Bojan Smojver" <bojan@rexursive.com>, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
       "Avuton Olrich" <avuton@gmail.com>,
       "Olivier Galibert" <galibert@pobox.com>,
       "Jan Rychter" <jan@rychter.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, grundig <grundig@teleline.es>,
       "Nigel Cunningham" <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
References: <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <200607082158.49013.rjw@sisk.pl> <9e0cf0bf0607081313m1a1874cbs22de11961103f36b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9e0cf0bf0607081313m1a1874cbs22de11961103f36b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200607082223.25131.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Saturday 08 July 2006 22:13, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/8/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > Well, I'm not totally against that, at least as far as -mm is concerned,
> > but I meant "in the long run".
> 
> Hello,
> 
> The fact that you are against that does not cancel this option. There
> are three of them...
> But can you please explain why you against that?

I said I were not.

Rafael