Re: splice/tee bugs?

[Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>]

On Mon, Jul 10 2006, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > > One slight strangeness.  Most of the time, the 
> > > "find . | ktee r | wc" command line takes about 0.1 seconds to 
> > > execute, but about 1 time in 5 on my x86 system, it takes about 
> > > 1.5 to 2 seconds to execute.  Any ideas about what's happening 
> > > there?
> > 
> > That is pretty odd. Any chance you can do a quick sysrq-t and see where
> > find/ktee/wc is stuck when this happens? You should not be seeing that,
> > naturally, I'll see if I can reproduce that here. How much data does
> > find . return in your example?
> 
> See the start of this message.
> 
> One sysrq-t output output below.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> find          D B9099C00     0 14170   4167         14171       (NOTLB)
>    ca279d04 00118054 00000008 b9099c00 003d0ca2 e7b0b9f8 00000009 d307f688
>    d307f580 c0459dc0 c1507620 b9099c00 003d0ca2 00000000 00000000 00118054
>    00000001 00001000 c015010e e647f5ac e647f5b8 00000046 00000000 00000000
> Call Trace:
>  <c015010e> __getblk+0x1d/0x225
>  <c03e1e7c> io_schedule+0x26/0x30
>  <c0150874> sync_buffer+0x37/0x3a
>  <c03e25fd> __wait_on_bit+0x33/0x59
>  <c015083d> sync_buffer+0x0/0x3a
>  <c03e2695> out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x72/0x7a
>  <c015083d> sync_buffer+0x0/0x3a
>  <c0127dd5> wake_bit_function+0x0/0x34
>  <c019e39b> search_by_key+0x133/0xd91
>  <c0110a1c> do_page_fault+0x0/0x532
>  <c0189e2d> search_by_entry_key+0x20/0x22f
>  <c015dc76> filldir64+0x8e/0xc3
>  <c019e214> pathrelse+0x1b/0x2f
>  <c019388c> reiserfs_readdir+0x3e3/0x3fb
>  <c0193895> reiserfs_readdir+0x3ec/0x3fb
>  <c018d6e5> reiserfs_update_sd_size+0x67/0x24c
>  <c01a55c9> journal_begin+0x9c/0xdc
>  <c0196cb0> reiserfs_dirty_inode+0x5a/0x76
>  <c016bacc> __mark_inode_dirty+0x2d/0x15e
>  <c015dd9a> vfs_readdir+0x58/0x6f
>  <c015de14> sys_getdents64+0x63/0xa8
>  <c015dbe8> filldir64+0x0/0xc3
>  <c010287f> syscall_call+0x7/0xb

So it's find being stuck, this doesn't look tee/splice related at all.
Can you reproduce the same thing just by doing the find . > /dev/null?

-- 
Jens Axboe